HINESBURG PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of November 1, 2000
APPROVED
Present:
Ted Bloomhardt, Roger Kohn, John Mace, Jean Isham, George Bedard, Carrie
Fenn, Fred Haulenbeek, and George Munson.
Also Faith Ingulsrud, Town Planner
Members
Absent:
Will Patten
Members of the
Audience:
Thomas Herbick, Al Barber, David Lyman, John Lyman, Rich Donato, Dana and
Fran Potter, Steve and Linda Carlson, Roy Bass, Robin Edelman, David Haber,
Peter Erb, Ruth LeBlanc, Lynn and Marie Gardner, Wayne Bissonette, Roger
Daggett, Patrick DeCelles, Moe Baker
1.
Saputo Foods - Follow up to Noise
Issue and Conceptual Site Plan.
Jean Isham, acting as Chair since Ted Bloomhardt was delayed, started
the meeting with discussions of the follow up to the noise issue. (Ted arrived a few minutes after and
took over as Chair). Thomas
Herbick, Plant Manager at Saputo Foods, explained that there has been a delay in
shipping of material for noise abatement, and testing should start Friday,
November 3rd. They hope
to have results next Friday, November 10th.
The conceptual
site plan review was then considered.
Faith said she spoke with Carl Colizza, Saputo’s permitting and
environmental person, and he explained
the plans being reviewed tonight are just concepts. Saputo will submit a site plan with more
detail after receiving input at tonight’s meeting. The 60 day deadline will start when
Saputo submit’s their final site plan.
Mr. Herbick
recognized that the sidewalk was an important issue, but that Saputo would like
to put it on hold for now. Roger
Kohn expressed the feelings of other Planning Commission members by saying that
the sidewalk is a feature that is wanted by all. It was noted that when the Planning
Commission had their site visit recently, they had to walk on the road. Roger added that it is hard to designate
planting locations now when a sidewalk will be put in later. Carrie Fenn suggested a sidewalk that
would meander among the plantings, not a straight line. George Munson felt that with all the
construction that will be going on, it would be simpler to do a sidewalk at the
same time. Jean Isham agreed with
all statements. Fred
Haulenbeek asked about the possibility of a crosswalk across Route 116 at Saputo
and Mechanicsville Road. Faith
explained that Vtrans determines locations of crosswalks based on a count of
actual pedestrian crossings. Tom
Lyman, from the audience, added that there are people who live on both sides of
Route 116, and that the Saputo/Mechanicsville Road intersection is a good
location because it is the high point of route 116.
Al Barber of the
Hinesburg Fire Department expressed concern about existing trees and safety
visibility at this intersection.
The foliage/low canopy causes a blind spot by the lower driveway and
coming out of Tom Lyman’s driveway.
Mr. Barber supports the idea of a sidewalk. Fred said that if the trees grow and
mature, they can be trimmed up to improve visibility. Both Mr. Barber and John Mace showed Mr.
Herbick the trees in question on the site plan. Ted Bloomhardt suggested moving the
trees back a bit from the road.
Since the trees are young, perhaps they could be transplanted
successfully. George Munson thought
the current tree location might be a good place to put the sidewalk. Mr. Barber added that there are
snowplowing problems with trees to close to the road.
Roger asked
about why the planter island in the parking lot on the original plan wasn’t
shown on the new plan. Mr. Herbick
asked if Saputo had to have the island because they are costly. He pointed out that Saputo is putting in
new landscaping and new siding for the building. Other members pointed out that the
planter island has the function of separating the parked cars from the entrance
drive and that the need for the island would depend on how the parking lot is
configured.
Fred made the
suggestion that the side of the building facing Mechanicsville Road be made more
attractive and pleasing. That area
will be the focal part of the building, even though it’s just a small part of
the large building and not the main entrance. It would be good community relations to
try to make that area as nice as possible.
A little creative carpentry to soften the look, some windows and a nice
wall mounted sign would make a big difference. Other Planning Commission members and
members of the audience strongly agreed.
George Munson added that currently the exterior of the building that
people seen near Route 116, doesn’t reflect all the improvements that have been
made in the entire plant.
Faith concluded
the discussions by noting that when the “real” site plan is submitted, then the
Planning Commission comments and decisions will be
official.
2. George Bedard - Public Meeting, Final
Plat Review. Ted Bloomhardt
opened the public hearing for the final plat review of the three-lot residential
subdivision on the north side of Texas Hill Road. George Bedard removed himself from the
Planning Commission for the purpose of making his presentation. He then described the subdivision in
detail. The building envelopes are
as shown on the plan. Each lot is
for a four bedroom, conventional septic design. An easement for Lot 1 is detailed on the
plan. The driveways were also
identified. Mr. Bedard met with
Mike Anthony, Road Foreman, and it was determined that Mr. Bedard needs to
replace a culvert under Texas Hill Road next to the driveway for Lot 1 with a
18" steel riveted culvert. The
driveways can divert water runoff onto the land. Mr. Bedard had wording for buyers about
ditching requirements to avoid water going on the road. The septic areas and septic system
designs were discussed. Mr. Bedard
has both a site plan with contours, and a site plan without. The plan without contours will be filed
with the Town. Ted asked why the
house on Lot 1 is located so near the road. Mr. Bedard explained it’s a nice
location with pine trees and there is more space for the house there, but the
owners have the option to move the envelope further back. Ditching requirements along Texas Hill
Road were discussed. Faith informed
Mr. Bedard that Rocky Martin, Public Works Director, thought ditching would have
to done in front of the whole project, and that some trees would have to be
removed. Ted asked if there will be
a buffer along the road. Mr. Bedard
replied there will be nice large
trees left and building envelopes will be marked on the ground so there will be
no confusion.
Roger reviewed
the sample deed language, and covenants were discussed. Faith asked about the sewer line from
Lot 1 to Lot 2 and the sleeve line pipe under the driveway. Mr. Bedard said he will take
responsibility to alert owners.
Roger also asked about the idea of a shared driveway. Mr. Bedard explained a shared driveway
would require more cutting, and would be a disruption of privacy for one of the
lots. People like their own
elements under their control. Both
Fred and George Munson agreed that a shared driveway situation would defeat the
purpose of private lots.
Faith
distributed a well log results summary of neighboring lots on Texas Hill. Mr. Bedard said he tells prospective
buyers that “water is their day at Las Vegas”. He recommends a dowser, but will not put
that in the covenants. Ditching
requirements by the Director of Public Works will be incorporated into the
conditions. Mr. Bedard meets with
prospective owners before construction to discuss compliance with the
requirements. Ted asked if
subdivision notes should be in the conditions. Roger thought they should be, so that
changes can’t be made without Planning Commission
approval.
Ted closed the
public hearing and made the following motion, which is attached to the end of
these minutes. George Munson
seconded, and it was unanimously approved (George Bedard
removed).
3. Rich Donato - Camp Conversion Access
Review. Mr. Donato came
before the Planning Commission seeking approval for year-round access to two
camps on the Upper Access Road (off of Pond Brook Road) as a pre-requisite to
conversion of the camps to year-round use.
The exact location of the camps and the access were discussed at
length. There seemed to be no
accurate or clear map. Lisa
Carlson, a member of the audience and neighbor of Mr. Donato, explained that all
deeds go back to the 1940's. She
said there is a road association with unanimous cooperation in the neighborhood
to maintain the right-of-way. This
agreement is recorded with the Town.
It was determined that Mr. Donato has a legal right-of- way to his
mother’s estate’s camp, and he has a tacit right-of-way via the Nelson’s
property to access his camp lot.
Although the
road does not meet the 18' wide road standard, it was determined by Al Barber of
the Fire Department that the road is in good shape and the width was
adequate. Lisa Carlson said that
widening the road to 18' would change the character of the road. Steve Carlson, also in the audience,
noted that two cars can usually pass by each other; once in a while one car may
have to pull over to make room.
John Mace noted
that the Bylaws require clearer site maps.
Roger suggested approval with the clearer site maps. George Munson would like to see
something drawn to scale. Ted
counted 12 lots served by the right-of-way, and he felt that this would set a
precedent for the other lot conversions.
George Bedard said converting to year-round has septic requirements which
are handled by the Zoning Board.
Roger Kohn made
the following motion:
The Hinesburg
Planning Commission hereby grants approval
to the Nancy Donato Estate for development on a private right-of-way for
the conversion of a comp to a full-time residence per Section 5.15.4 of the
Zoning Bylaw. This approval shall
be as a road proposed by the applicant and subject to the following
conditions:
1.
The applicant
and all subsequent owners of the property shall share in the cost of
maintenance, repair and snow plowing of the Upper Access Road. The applicant shall work with the
neighbors to implement a more formal road maintenance agreement and shall report
back to the Planning Commission within six months on the status of the
agreement. If no such agreement is
reached the Planning Commission may impose an additional condition requiring the
applicant’s lot to share in the road costs in a specified
manner.
2.
The
improvements to Upper Access Road recommended by the fire chief shall be done
and are as follows: A few trees and
overhead limbs shall be cut to allow emergency vehicles to pass along the
road. A representative of the Fire
Department shall inspect and approve the road before a Certificate of Occupancy
is issued for the full-time use.
3.
A Certificate
of Occupancy for full-time use shall be issued before the camp can be occupied
as a year-round residence.
4.
The road
serving the lot shall be plowed and maintained to at least its current
width.
5.
At such time as
additional houses using any portion of the access road receive approval for
development on a private right-of-way to serve year-round residences, if the
Planning Commission requires improvements to the road, the owner of this lot
shall share equally in the cost of such road improvements. This may occur at any time in the future
that such additional camp conversions occur.
6.
The application
for approval of Rich Donato’s camp shall be continued to a future meeting to be
determined by applicant and staff, and that prior to the meeting the applicant
shall provide a detailed sketch to scale showing the road in relation to
property lines and buildings.
George Bedard
seconded the motion, and it was unanimously approved.
4. Gardner - Site Plan
Amendment. Lynn and Marie Gardner explained that
they wanted to make their wood processing shed, which had previously been
approved, 20 feet longer. The
additional size is to keep the elevator inside, undercover. Ted noted that there is nothing new here,
except adding 20 feet.
Faith relayed that
she had received a call from one of the neighbors who wished to remain anonymous
concerned with smoke and certain smells.
Faith told the caller to speak with Zoning regarding enforcement of
performance standards. The call was
not related to the addition of the shed.
Roger Kohn made the
following motion:
The Hinesburg
Planning Commission hereby grants site plan approval to Lynn and Marie Gardner
to extend the previously approved 20' X 30' wood processing shed by 20' to
result in a 20' X 50' storage shed.
The approval is an amendment to the 12/02/98 site plan approval and is
subject to the following conditions:
1.
All conditions
of the 12/02/98 site plan approval and follow-up approvals are hereby
incorporated.
Jean Isham seconded,
and it was unanimously approved.
5. Bissonette - Sketch Plan Review for
Simple Parceling. George Bedard recused himself from
discussion. Wayne Bissonette
explained that he is in the process of selling the Hines house at the
intersection of Hines and Gilman Road.
He is seeking approval for a 2.08 acre lot around the house. Utilities will go under Gilman
Road. A septic replacement area was
reserved for the house on Lot #3 of the subdivision on the north side of the
road.
Faith distributed
water test results. Mr. Bissonette
had a letter from the State Department of Environmental Conservation providing a
homestead exemption which meant the septic replacement area is exempt from state
standards. Roger read from the
Hinesburg Planning Commission policy adopted 5/6/98 “Policy on Septic System
Requirements for New Lots with Existing Dwellings”. Soil logs for the 5 lot subdivision
across the road include soil logs from this lot. Test pits are shown on that file. Roger said that soil pit and isolation
distances should be transcribed on the plan, or referred to the plan it is
on.
Mr. Bissonette
provided sample easement language.
There was some discussion about sample language versus final deed
language. The Planning Commission
usually sees final language. Jean
Isham suggested easement language be reviewed by Roger without coming before the
Planning Commission. Faith
commented that at some point the Planning Commission needs to have an attorney
designated to read language, not just rely on Roger. Roger then edited the sample deed
language.
Ted Bloomhardt made
the following motion which is attached to the end of these minutes. John Mace seconded the motion, and it
was unanimously approved, with George Bedard abstaining from the
vote.
6. Erb Subdivision Revision. (Roger Kohn abstained from discussion) Peter Erb came before the Planning
Commission seeking approval to change the location for his proposed primary
septic system. Mr. Erb explained
that they have found a new site for the primary system and wish to keep the two
replacements areas as originally approved.
John asked about neighboring wells and well head protection. Spencer Harris’ letter regarding the
septic system meeting state standards did not mention this. The new owners of the Synder lot, Robin
Edelman and David Haber, were in the audience and expressed concern about the
distance from their well. Everyone
reviewed the plans and all were satisfied with isolation distances. Jean felt that the site plan should be
updated to show isolation distances between wells. It was also decided the plat should be
revised to show the easement. John
suggested the neighbors wells should be shown on the plat as well. George Bedard said the neighbors’ wells
may be interior enough within the neighbors’ lots, so that it shouldn’t be an
issue.
Ted Bloomhardt then
made the following motion:
The Hinesburg
Planning Commission hereby revises the Subdivision approval granted to Peter and
Dierdre Erb on November 4, 1998 for a 10.07 acre single family residential lot
on land owned by Stephanie Spencer and Rolf Keilman on the east side of Turkey
Lane, by approving a new location for the primary septic leach field north of
the project parcel on land owned by the Spencer/Keilmans. The new leach field shall be as shown on
septic design plan and detail sheets prepared by Vermont Contours, Inc., and
dated 10/16/00. The previously
approved leach field site shall serve as the replacement area. This approval shall be subject to the
following conditions:
1.
A revised plat
showing the new septic easements and replacement area and showing wellhead
protection areas where they overlap the boundary of the Keilman/Spencer
subdivision shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days of this
approval.
2.
Deed language
pertaining to the septic easement shall be submitted to the Planning Commission
for review and approval at or before the plat is submitted.
3.
All conditions
of the 11/4/98 Subdivision Approval shall continue to apply except for those
superceded by this motion.
Jean Isham
seconded, and it was unanimously approved, with the George Bedard and Roger Kohn
abstaining from the vote.
7. Bass Subdivision Revision. Roy Bass
indicated he had two proposed locations for his septic system that meet State
standards according to Spencer Harris.
His primary site is the location that everyone has agreed upon. The replacement area is the original
location above his house site, which would require moving his well. In order to get his certificate of
occupancy quickly, he wants to propose these locations, and then do some more
long-term work in finding a better replacement location. George Bedard commented that Mr. Bass
should not have to move his well at his expense. Mr. Bass was not concerned about
shouldering that responsibility.
Mr. Bass was
asked to clarify Spencer Harris’s wording the septic “reasonably” meets State
standards. Faith said she asked Spencer about this and he said he added the term
“reasonably” because John Stewart did not provide all the information required
by state standards on the drawing.
Spencer confirmed that the design and soils meet state
standards.
Ted Bloomhardt
made the following motion:
The Hinesburg
Planning Commission hereby approves the location of the septic system leach
field in the new primary location drawn on plans by JH Stewart received by the
Hinesburg Planning Commission on 11/1/00.
This approval shall be subject to the following
conditions:
1.
The system is
to be installed as shown on the plans.
Adjacent tree cutting or damage shall be minimized during
construction
2.
The replacement
area shall be the original septic location above the house as opposed to the
replacement area to the west side of the lot as shown on the plans. The drilled well shall be moved prior to
the use of the replacement field.
3.
The applicant
shall provide the Planning Commission within 60, days a plan drawn by an
engineer or surveyor showing the survey of the lot and the primary and
replacement septic areas and the well and house location, and stating all prior
plans for this lot no longer have Planning Commission approval. After approval by Planning Commission
this plan shall be filed within 90 days of November 1, 2000.
4.
Compliance with
Condition #3 shall not prevent a certificate of occupancy from being
issued.
Carrie Fenn seconded
the motion, and it was unanimously approved.
8. Daggett Subdivision Review. (Roger Kohn abstained from discussion) Roger Daggett, Patrick DeCelles and Moe
Baker came before the Planning Commission requesting approval for a revision in
the final plat condition that required a 27' long flat landing at Pond
Road. Mr. Daggett explained that
there is no flat section at the bottom of their road. He proposed a temporary solution of
building two shorter pull off sections.
Other solutions that could be acted upon in a year or two would be to
possibly pave the first 400 feet of the road, or to move the road. Paving the road would help the ice melt
faster and they could do the paving next summer. Moving the road so it would swing into
Dynamite Hill would take time and negotiation with their
neighbor.
Faith said that Bud
Allen, town attorney, was uncomfortable with the Planning Commission granting
approval for a temporary solution to a safety problem without a more permanent
solution pending. Mr. Allen felt it
would open the Town to liability.
Mr. Daggett said
that the safety issue of sliding off the steep road into traffic on Pond Road
was discussed before they bought the land.
The flat spot at the bottom of the road was there. But then a culvert had to be installed
and that changed the slope. George
Bedard said that Rocky Martin, Public Works, thought paving was not the best
solution. Moving the entrance on
Pond Road could be accomplished so it would require minimal
construction.
Ted commented
that the Planning Commission is being asked to approve something that doesn’t
meet specs, and that may meet spec in a year or two. Mr. Daggett said that they are proposing
future solutions that are within their means. Ted also asked what the incentive was to
fix the problem once they get their certificate of occupancies. George Bedard felt that any approval
given would have to have a condition to get them to return to the Planning
Commission. Faith said that Bud
Allen suggested a warning sign on Pond Road, to alert people driving on Pond
Road about cars sliding off Dynamite Hill into them. Faith noted that the Selectboard should
decide on appropriate signage and improving visibility. Someone commented that the pull off on
the driveway would force any out-of-control car off the driveway and not onto
Pond Road.
Ted Bloomhardt made
the following motion:
The Hinesburg
Planning Commission moves to remove the Final Plat Condition for a 27' long flat
landing where the driveway meets Pond Road (Condition #11a from approval dated
1/5/00 and revised 1/19/00) with the following conditions:
1.
The applicant
shall install pull offs along the driveway at the bottom and approximately 1/3
of the way up the hill near the first power pole, south and northside
respectfully, within 30 days of this approval.
2.
The
applicant shall return to the Planning Commission by June 1, 2001 with plans to
move the road cut to allow a flat entry onto Pond Road or alternative
improvements such as paving to improve the roadway may be proposed. Alternatives shall be proposed only
after all avenues for roadcut movement are pursued.
George Bedard
seconded. Five Planning Commission
members voted for; one against; and Roger Kohn abstained from the
vote.
The meeting
adjourned at 12:20
am.
Respectfully
submitted,
Sally Kimball,
Recording Secretary
HINESBURG PLANNING
COMMISSION
George and Janis Bedard - Final Plat Approval
November 1, 2000
The Hinesburg
Planning Commission hereby grants final plat approval to George and Janis Bedard
for a 3-lot single family residential subdivision on a 34.61 acre lot located on
the north side of Texas Hill Road (tax map parcel #6-1-63.11). Lot #1 is 10.45 acres, Lot #2 is 13.74
acres and Lot #3 is 10.42 acres.
The subdivision shall be as shown on Plat and a separate Site Plan by
G.E. Bedard Inc. dated October 8, 2000, and shall be subject to the following
conditions:
3.
Utility lines
shall be placed underground as required in Section 7.9.1 of the Subdivision
Regulations.
4.
All exterior
lighting with bulbs over 100 watts shall be installed or shielded in such a
manner as to conceal light sources and reflector/refractor areas from view from
points beyond the lot.
5.
Any principal
structure and any garage shall be located in the building envelope shown on the
plat. No zoning permit shall be
issued for any structures outside the building envelopes shown without approval
of the Planning Commission.
6.
The Subdivision
Notes 1, 2, 3 shall be included as covenants in the deeds and shall not be
changed without Planning Commission approval.
7.
All
clear-cutting on the lots shall conform with Subdivision Note #3 found on the
Plat and Site Plan. In addition, no
trees other than dead trees, shall be removed along the 40' front yard setback on Lot 1 except as
required for the driveway or utilities.
8.
All new lot
owners are warned that there have been more low yielding drilled wells in the
vicinity of this subdivision than high yielding wells. Buyers of these properties should be
prepared to take measures to ensure an adequate water supply, such as providing
sufficient storage volume in the well.
9.
Individual driveways
serving each lot, are proposed from the Town Road to the house sites on each
lot. The driveways shall be
constructed, maintained and plowed at least 12 feet in width and shall have at
least 12" of gravel. The driveways
shall be shown on the final plat and shall be placed substantially as shown on
the plan. No driveway shall be a
straight line from Texas Hill Road to the home site.
10.
Construction
and maintenance of the driveways shall conform with Subdivision Note #5 on the
Site Plan and Plat to ensure proper drainage of the driveways. Additionally, improvements shall be made
to the drainage on Texas Hill Road along the front of this property to
accommodate the added drainage from the subdivision. Improvements shall be as recommended in
a November 1, 2000 memo by the Town Public Works Director and the Highway
Foreman, as follows :
a.
The culvert under Texas Hill Road next to the driveway for Lot #1 (marked
culvert #1 on the plan) shall be replaced with an 18" steel riveted
culvert. The applicant shall pay
for the culvert but it will be installed by the Town.
b.
Ditching along Texas Hill Road shall consist of tree removal, locating
ditch line and construction of ditching.
All will be coordinated with Highway Foreman Mike Anthony including final
approval and acceptance before a zoning permit is issued for development of the
first lot.
11.
The sample deed
language on the Lot #1 Septic Easement approved by the Planning Commission,
shall be substantially included in the deeds for Lots #1 and 2.
12.
The applicant
is reminded of the necessity of obtaining a driveway permit from the Town of
Hinesburg before a zoning permit may be obtained for construction on any
lot.
13.
The septic
systems for Lots #1-3 are designed for 4-bedroom houses on each lot and shall be
installed in such a way that each system meets the standards of the State
Environmental Protection Rules, as shown on plans and details by Robert Carter
dated October 16, 2000. Any
increase in the number of bedrooms shall be approved by the Planning
Commission.
14.
Before
obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for each dwelling, the owner of the land
shall require that an engineer submit a letter to the Zoning Administrator
stating that the septic system has been built in accordance with the approved
plans.
15.
"Substantial
Construction" for this subdivision shall consist of construction of the first
driveway and the Texas Hill Road improvements in Condition #8 above. No driveway construction shall take
place until a Zoning Permit is issued for the lot accessed by the driveway. If substantial construction has
not begun within 3 years from the date of this approval, final plat approval
shall expire.
16.
The mylar of
this subdivision and a copy of the conditions of approval shall be recorded in
the Hinesburg Land Records within 90 days of this
approval.
17.
No further
subdivision of this property shall occur per Subdivision Note
#2.
The above motion was passed by the Hinesburg
Planning Commission on November 1, 2000.
_____________________________
Theodore Bloomhardt,
Chairman
Hinesburg Planning
Commission
HINESBURG PLANNING
COMMISSION
Wayne
and Barbara Bissonette - Sketch Plan Approval for Simple
Parceling
November 1, 2000
The Hinesburg
Planning Commission hereby grants sketch plan approval to Wayne and Barbara
Bissonette for simple parceling of one 2.08 acre single family residential lot
around the existing “Hines Farm House Lot” at the corner of Gilman and Hines
Road leaving the remaining farm land undeveloped (tax map parcel
#9-2-38.1). The simple parceling
shall be as shown on a plat titled “Property Survey for Wayne R. and Barbara B.
Bissonette by G.E. Bedard, Inc. and dated June 28, 2000, last revised October
11, 2000. This approval shall be
subject to the following conditions:
1.
The applicant
has provided a homestead exemption from the State Department of Environmental
Conservation and has designated a replacement septic area along with an engineer
letter certifying this meets the requirements for simple parceling with an
existing dwelling.
2.
Any new utility
lines shall be placed underground as required in Section 7.9.1 of the
Subdivision Regulations.
3.
The deed
language for the septic easement shall be as presented and
modified.
4.
Before the
replacement area designated in the septic easement on the parcel across Gilman
Road (Lot #3 on the plat) is used, the applicant shall obtain a Utility Permit
from the Selectboard for placing the force main under Gilman Road and shall
comply with all requirements of that permit. The data for the replacement area is as
shown on the 5 lot subdivision data.
5.
In keeping with
the rural character of Hinesburg and to prevent unnecessary glare, any exterior
lighting using bulbs with a brightness greater than 100 watts, shall be
installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and
reflector/refractor areas from view from points beyond the
lot.
6.
The mylar of
this subdivision and a copy of the conditions of approval shall be recorded in
the Hinesburg Land Records within 90 days of this approval with the language
required in Section 3.3.2(3) of the Subdivision
Regulations.
7.
No further
subdivision of this property shall occur and no development shall take place on
the retained farm land without subdivision review and approval of the Hinesburg
Planning Commission.
The above motion was
passed by the Hinesburg Planning Commission on November 1,
2000.
_____________________________
Theodore Bloomhardt,
Chairman
Hinesburg Planning
Commission