HINESBURG PLANNING COMMISSION

       Minutes of April 10, 2001

APPROVED

 

Present:            Ted Bloomhardt, Roger Kohn, John Mace, Jean Isham, George Bedard, Fred Haulenbeek, and Will Patten.  Also Faith Ingulsrud, Town Planner                                   

 

Members Absent:            Carrie Fenn, George Munson                                   

 

Members of the Audience:            none

 

1.  Joint Meeting with School Board.  The Planning Commission met with the Hinesburg Elementary School Board for a presentation on the relationship between new housing and school population.  Faith explained that the presentation is the culmination of over a year’s work by the School-Housing Steering Committee.  The Planning Commission could use the modeling program to better understand and track new residential development as it impacts school population and facility needs, and the School Board could use the modeling program to better anticipate school population.   The modeling program could also show at what point new housing would overwhelm the school as well as over-burden town services.  Faith introduced Will Costello who has been working on developing the modeling program, and David Spitz who has been hired to propose policy and directions for the project.

 

Mr. Costello presented the computerized modeling system.  He described the four sectors involved: (1) housing, (2) population, (3) regulations and tax rates, and , (4) quality of life, or why people would want to live in Hinesburg.  Future demographics show a decline in school population (grades K through 8) between now and 2012.  How much of a rebound in these numbers depends on how many 18 year olds will stay in Hinesburg and raise families.  Mr. Costello pointed out that if the value of land and property in Hinesburg continues to rise, then there will be more higher income houses which statistically contribute fewer children to the school population.  If you wanted to increase school population, you ideally would encourage more lower income/affordable housing.  Mr. Costello then showed different scenarios on the modeling software program.  Hinesburg has been adding about 15 new houses a year over the past 10 years.  When more houses at different income levels are added, the school population is impacted.  The “tipping point” of adding 60 to 65 houses in a year is when there is a noticeable increase to school population.  It was agreed that Hinesburg will probably not get to that point.  Mr. Costello added that contrary to popular opinion, study after study shows that school quality is not a factor for why people choose to live in a particular town.

 

Mr. Spitz then presented  his findings on education costs and land use planning.  He provided detailed information on the school population projections for Hinesburg.  Hinesburg’s decline in enrollments is similar to what’s happening in Shelburne and Charlotte.  More kids are graduating than kindergarteners are coming in.  Mr. Spitz had detailed information on the implications of this decline on school funding through Act 60.  With declining enrollment, if the cost per student goes up, and the per student state grant does not compensate, then taxes will increase.  A tax rate worksheet illustrated his point; it is important to watch costs as student numbers go down.

 


In terms of land use planning, Mr. Spitz noted that you can’t tell people how much they have to spend on building a house, but you can set policies that will encourage different types of housing.  He recommends that there be residential sewer allocations to increase school enrollments.  Faith said that it is likely that sewer allocations will be less a constraint in a few years when smaller “package” treatment facilities are likely to be allowed by the State.  Mr. Spitz provided a map of Hinesburg indicating that up to 6000 acres of land not eligible before, may meet the septic capacity guidelines, if the Phase II State septic system regulations are passed.  George Bedard guessed that half of those acres would still not be suitable for building houses due to other factors.  He also thought the new lots that would be opened up because of the new proposed septic regulations would be huge with expensive homes (statistically not a lot of kids in homes of that price range).

 

Ted Bloomhardt said the model shows there has to be a great amount of development to impact the school.  School Board members also approved of the modeling program in demonstrating that declining enrollment has an impact, and the database can track just how much of a decline is occurring.

 

Maintenance and upkeep of the tracking system was discussed.  Should this be just for Hinesburg, or should it be maintained regionally, as everyone regionally would benefit.  Faith said that there has already been a request to do a modeling presentation for Chittenden County planners at the Regional Planning Commission.  In response to a comment by Colleen MacKinnon regarding the need to look and the impact of development on other town services, Faith noted that in a year, the Planning Commission will be working on the new Town Plan and perhaps could use a model like this to look at development impacts on other Town services..  Although no definitive decision was made on who would be responsible for maintaining the system, it was observed that the community involvement in Hinesburg was a big factor in making the model work. 

 

 

2.  Miscelleneous.

The next meeting of the Planning Commission will be Tuesday, April 17th at 8:30 p.m. to meet with the Zoning Board regarding the concept of a Development Review Board (DRB).  Since there are no applicants scheduled to meet with the Planning Commission, Faith suggested a few loose ends be taken care of either before or after meeting with the Zoning Board.

 

The May 2nd meeting will be for applicants.  A work session on rural density and ridgeline zoning  was scheduled for May 23rd.

.

Ted Bloomhardt moved to accept the Matthew Morse deed language as corrected.  Jean Isham seconded, and it was unanimously approved.

 

Ted suggested David Spitz come to a meeting to talk about his final proposals.   Ted also described the status of the Zoning Administrator position job search.

 

 

The meeting adjourned at 9:00 pm.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

 

Sally Kimball, Recording Secretary