HINESBURG DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 15, 2005

Approved

 

Members present: Tom McGlenn, Clint Emmons, Howdy Russell, George Munson and Robert Gauthier arrived at 8:05pm.

 

Staff member: Peter Erb

 

Members of the Audience:  Tim & Kay Ballard, Maryjane Ballard, Ron Derouchie, Tod Lyman, Mark Lelli, Peter Mead, Shawn Lyman, Stephen Vock, George Bedard, Susan Mead and Jennifer Ayer.

 

1.         MINUTES

            February 1, 2005 Tom McGlenn motions to approve, Clint Emmons seconds this motion. Approval unanimous.

 

2.         BALLARD - Sketch plan, 2 lot subdivision.

            The previous approval lapsed for this request.

            Lot #2 is 3.60 acres subdivided from 222.9 acres of the original property. This is to be used for farming.  There is a building envelope of about 1 acres where a            trailer sits.  The North/East end of the building envelope is available for a garage.  Access to the property is on the North side.

 

            Is there a defined curb cut?

            Curb has been in place for years.  If there is a question of its location the state may ask for it to be moved.

            There is a gentle slope for run off.

            The water supply is town water with a shut off.

            For wastewater state permits have been obtained.

            There has been an inspection of where septic is to be located. Nothing suspicious.  An engineered replacement system is available.

            Land outside the building envelope has an easement area  for the family farm and will benefit the children later     on.

 

            The replacement area is on the lot behind the home.

            Normal setbacks should be 200ft. Home is 200ft. from agricultural land.

 

            The old order requested that the home be situated East to West. However, the house has been situated North to South.

 

            Tom McGlenn motions for conditions of approval using the old conditions as modified.

            Howdy Russell Seconds.

            Approval unanimous.

 

3.         IROQUOIS MANUFACTURING COMPANY,Inc. - Site plan review & conditional use permit.

 

            Steve Vock, Engineer for Iroquois.

            At present there are 2 curb cuts for the lot to be developed.  One of these will be eliminated with this project.

            The new building is proposed to be 18,000 sq.ft.

            This space will be used for; office space, a showroom and installation area.

            The water supply will be town water.

            The sewer system to be extended to the town sewer through an easement through the neighbors property or to be extended to the current sewer system of Iroquois.

            Storm water runoff will be directed to a “detention pond”.

            Water will be directed to this pond.  There will be a constant level of water in the treatment facility and will have the appearance of actual pond.

            The detention pond holds the water and slowly lets it out.

            There will be a 25% reduction of storm water discharge with this system in place.

 

            Landscaping improvements; Red Maples, Crab Apple trees, White Birch and other shrubbery and hedge will be added.   A listing of all plantings is located in the    plans.

 

Lighting - Wall packs with 1 pole light at 16’ high.  The highest light other than that will   be 6’ candle light of exterior of building. Intended for safely only. Color of bulb      will be clear light.

 

            A gravel strip will be the border of the driveway along the stream.  Pavement will be used in the parking and loading areas.  This will be useful for loading and       unloading plus maintenance will be cleaner and easier.

 

Retail - Accessories for trucks, plows, lights, etc. There will be no product change.  They will be maintaining what they do and use now.

 

(Robert Gauthier joins the board 8:05pm)

 

            A list will be provided to the file of the Iroquois products.

 

Fencing issue - A mesh material will be placed over the chain link fence that borders the stream.

Public member Mark Lelli is the property owner across the stream from the now visible storage yard of Iroquois equipment.  His concern for the type of material used on the fence is that it will be attractive to view from his home.  As the property sits now it is not pleasing.

An agreement of a sample of the material and possible input of color to be presented to the board.

 

Snow removal - The snow will be plowed toward the back of the building where the run off will be directed away from the building, road and stream and into the detention pond.

 

            There are presently 54 employees.  An increase by about 15-20 is estimated with this new building.

            The traffic has been monitored by Iroquois and roughly speaking 6-10 cars per day during the slower months and 12-14 cars per day for busier times of the year.

 

            Pedestrian crossing is a concern as well as pedestrians walking down the hill towards town and CVU.

            A tunnel was suggested but not logical due to the slope of the property. 

            There was no objection from Iroquois to the proposal of making sure there was enough room on the side of the road for a walkway that may need to be installed            by Hinesburg for these pedestrians.

 

            Loading and unloading will take place behind a gated entrance inside the driveway.  It is required that the vehicles are located behind the building and not             in view from the front.

            Iroquois states that occasionally they will need to stack the products if there is a double shipment or two shipments that arrive at the same time.  These will be        moved to the rear of the building as quickly as possible.

 

            Shipping and receiving will still be in the location across the street.

            The noise level is not an issue as the installation process is not offensive. All the manufacturing will still be done across the street.

            Conservation Community Member, Susan Mead, questions the storm water run off in regards to the slope of the drive.  There is a 2% slope of the paved area on the East end of the proposed building and is directed in the stream direction.  However, the design meets the requirements.  This will be the buffers and Act 250 requires them to maintain this and in fact the pavement will be easier to maintain storm run off.

            Area behind gate will be for only turning into the bay area of the building for installation.

            The back up area sited on plans is for turn around only, however, there is a gate there for access to the reservoir if needed.

 

            Public member Jenny Ayer owns the property in the NW corner.  She would like to be able to have input of the materials used for the fencing and if the fencing could go up as far as their property.  Also, the old sugarhouse needs to be taken down as it’s full of old metal and other neglected materials.

 

            Have alternate sources of power been discussed.  Creating a “Green” Project    would be beneficial and should be considered. (example: NRG on rte. 116)

            Signage- A duplicate sign will be installed.  Bulbs are not to be visible.  Two sided.

            Will there be ledge removal?  Little to none is expected but if so the removal will be mat and shoot not hydraulics.  Minimizing the rock removal.  Pre-blast survey will be done for the residents.

           

            A three part approval required:  Site plan, sign and conditional use. Continue with screening options and samples.

           

            Date specific of continuing review, March 15, 2005.

 

Tom McGlenn motions for continuation to March 15, 2005.

Howdy Russell seconds this motion.

Approval unanimous.

 

4.         ST.CYR - 2-lot subdivision sketch plan.

           

            Septic by Brad Ramsey.

            St.Cyr sits back less that 400’ from rte 116.

            Frontage can be treated like a side or rear yard.

            The Tyler Bridge Rd. is the access location.

            Water is to be from the same well as the current home.

            Primary and replacement are on lot and the other lot has it’s own.

            Deed restriction and language to be crafted.  Restrictive access on 116.

            An amendment to the permit form as not creating a new lot just a new boundary line within the property.

            Amended plat to be filed. Road frontage access language on the plat as well.

 

            Tom McGlenn motions to direct staff to draw up draft conditions of approval for sketch plan

            Howdy Russell seconds.

            Approval unanimous.

 

5.         COLLINS- Sketch plan approval.

            Clint Emmons motions to approve.

            George Munson seconds.

            Approval unanimous.

 

6.         STOLPER- Conditional use approval.

            George Munson motions to approve.

            Robert Gauthier seconds.

            Approval unanimous.

 

7.         JEFF DAVIS- Continuance for 3/1/05.

            George Munson  motions to approve.

            Howdy Russell seconds.

            Approval unanimous.

 

8.         MUNSON- Preliminary plat approval.

            George and Howdy excuse themselves from this vote.

            (Ted Bloomhardt calls in for the vote from Denver CO.)

            Clint Emmons motions to approve.

            Robert Gauthier seconds.

            Approval unanimous.

 

 

Meeting adjourned at 9:30 pm.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Hannah Butler

Recording Secretary

nation:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none; text-autospace:none'>Respectfully submitted,

 

Hannah Butler

Recording Secretary

ody> >